24,428 courses · 2,504 curriculum guides Sponsored by eAgentic Software Sponsored by eAgentic Software

Documentary Film and Video

FIL4364 — Traditions of Documentary Film
← Course Modules
3 credit hours 45 contact hours Prerequisites: NONE at either carrier. *** BOTH CARRIERS TEACH THE STATEWIDE SUBJECT, differing in emphasis: FAU ("Traditions of Documentary Film") is theoretical and international and reproduces the statewide description almost verbatim; UWF ("Documentary Film and Television") is historical and SOCIOLOGICAL and includes television. *** READ THE STATEWIDE DESCRIPTION'S LIST: style, IDEOLOGY, technology, determination. Not a neutral history of a genre - documentary claims to show the world and the course interrogates that claim. Expect substantial ethics content. *** THE PRACTICAL DIVERGENCE IS CREDITS: moving UWF to FAU you carry 3 against a 4-credit course, which surfaces at the final audit, not at transfer. Ask how the shortfall is handled. *** FAU RUNS THIS WHOLE PREFIX AT 4 CREDITS (11 of its 21 undergraduate FIL courses) where every other institution is almost entirely 3 - a pattern, not a fact about this course. *** Screenings are additional, and documentaries are often feature length. v1.0

Course Description

Documentary Film and Video is the upper-division survey of non-fiction filmmaking — how it developed, the forms it has taken, and the questions it raises that fiction film does not. In the Florida statewide course numbering system it sits at FIL4364.

The statewide description is unusually well drawn for an older entry: a "survey of the diverse forms and historical functions of nonfiction films and video throughout the world, analysis of representative and significant texts; discussion of issues of style, ideology, technology, determination." ⚠ Note what that list contains. Ideology is named alongside style — the course is not a neutral history of a genre. Documentary's central problem is that it claims to show the world, and the course is largely about interrogating that claim.

Two carriers, aligned on subject and apart on scale

Florida Atlantic — 4 creditsUniversity of West Florida — 3 credits
Its titleTraditions of Documentary FilmDocumentary Film and Television
Its descriptionthe statewide description, essentially verbatim — forms and historical functions worldwide, style, ideology, technology, determination"Historical and sociological study of the development of documentary film and television… analysis of documentary film techniques and viewing of selected documentaries"
EmphasisTheoretical and international; the traditions as critical categories⚠ Historical and sociological; and it explicitly includes television

Both are recognisably the statewide subject, and the difference is one of emphasis rather than of content: Florida Atlantic leans toward documentary theory and world cinema, UWF toward the social history of the form and its life on television. ⚠ The credit difference is the more practical divergence, and it is an institutional pattern rather than a judgement about this course — see the hours note below.

One small vocabulary point worth noticing, because it dates the sources: the state says video, UWF says television, and Florida Atlantic says neither. All three are reaching for the same thing — non-fiction work that is not theatrical film — and today that overwhelmingly means streaming. The category has outgrown every one of the three words.

Learning Outcomes

Required Outcomes

Optional Outcomes

Major Topics

Required Topics

Optional Topics

Resources & Tools

Career Pathways

Special Information

Course format and hours

A lecture-and-screening course assessed by written analysis. 3 credits and 45 contact hours is published here — 3 credits is the value carried across almost the whole FIL prefix in Florida, and 45 follows the 1:15 convention. No institution publishes a contact-hour figure.

⚠⚠ At Florida Atlantic this course is 4 credits, so 60 hours is the right figure there. That is an institutional pattern rather than a statement about this course: 11 of Florida Atlantic's 21 undergraduate FIL courses are 4 credits, where every other Florida institution carries the prefix almost entirely at 3. ⚠ It means an FAU film student accumulates credit faster per course than a comparison of course counts would suggest.

Screenings are additional to scheduled hours, and documentaries are frequently feature length. Budget two to three hours a week for viewing.

Offering Notes

Two Florida public institutions carry this number, at different credit values. Neither publishes contact hours.

Transfer

Guaranteed transfer to an institution offering the same course — narrow with two carriers, and the credit difference is the practical friction. ⚠ A student moving from UWF to Florida Atlantic carries 3 credits against a 4-credit course, which in a tightly budgeted major surfaces at the final audit rather than at transfer. Ask the receiving department how it handles the shortfall before you plan a term around it, and send the syllabus and screening list rather than the title.

Position in the curriculum

Upper division, with no prerequisite at either carrier, so it is more accessible than the number suggests. It sits well after a film history survey and alongside the genre and styles courses. For students on the production track it pairs naturally with documentary production work — ⚠ and the ethics content here is the part that matters most once you are actually pointing a camera at a real person.

Dual enrolment and general education

No Gordon Rule or general-education designation is recorded at either carrier. Dual-enrolment high-school credit at this level is uniformly elective across the prefix.

AI Integration

⚠⚠⚠ Documentary is the course where generative AI is not merely a study-skills question but part of the subject matter, because the form's entire claim rests on a relationship to what actually happened — and synthetic images and audio attack that claim directly.

Where the tools help as study aids: background research on a period, a movement or a filmmaker; explaining a technique or a mode before you meet it; transcribing your own interview or screening notes; drafting an essay outline you then write; and locating documentaries to watch on a topic.

Where they fail as study aids, and it is familiar:a generated "analysis" describes the discourse around a film rather than the film, and will confidently describe sequences that are not in it; dates, filmmakers and attributions are frequently wrong and must be checked against Nichols or Barnouw; and coverage of non-Western documentary traditions degrades sharply, which is exactly the material a course emphasising "throughout the world" is trying to supply.

⚠⚠ And the part that belongs in the syllabus rather than in a warning

Synthetic media is now a documentary problem, and a serious course will say so:

If your section does not raise this, raise it yourself. ⚠ It is the live version of the course's oldest question — Flaherty staged scenes in Nanook in 1922, and the argument about where reconstruction ends and fabrication begins has never been settled. Synthetic media is that argument with better tools.

Ethics and rights in your own work: ⚠⚠ if you film real people, consent is not a formality — and consent obtained for one use does not cover another. Do not upload footage of identifiable people to external services, and where your subjects are minors or vulnerable, treat the material as confidential by default.

Academic integrity: follow your instructor's stated policy and disclose tool use. The standard is the same as elsewhere in film studies — you watched it, and every claim can be pointed at on screen — and in this course it carries an extra resonance, since the subject is what it means to make a truthful claim about something you recorded.


Generated September 17, 2026 · Updated September 17, 2026