24,428 courses · 2,504 curriculum guides Sponsored by eAgentic Software Sponsored by eAgentic Software

EEE4330: Microelectronics Engineering

EEE4330 — EEE4330
← Course Modules
3 credit hours 45 contact hours Prerequisites: FAMU/FSU: EEE 3300 and EEE 3300L. WARNING: this is a fabrication course - oxidation, diffusion, metallisation and photolithography are chemical and materials processes, and students arriving from a purely circuits background should expect the first weeks to be materials science rather than electronics. v1.0

Course Description

EEE 4330 Microelectronics Engineering is a fabrication course. Where a device course explains how a transistor behaves, this one explains how it is made — the sequence of chemical, thermal and optical processes that turn a bare silicon wafer into working integrated circuits, and the reasons each step limits what the finished device can do.

The Statewide Course Numbering System titles it Microelectronics Engineering and describes it as covering the “design and fabrication of solid-state devices. Topics include oxidation, diffusion, metallization, photolithography, and device characterization.” The FAMU–FSU College of Engineering bulletin gives the same description, with prerequisites of EEE 3300 and EEE 3300L.

⚠ One Florida institution carries this number: Florida A&M University, at 3 credits. Although the course appears in the shared FAMU–FSU College of Engineering bulletin, the statewide records show the active offering at FAMU. Students at either institution of the joint college should confirm current availability with the department, since the two share a faculty and a curriculum but not always a course inventory.

What kind of course this is. The five topics in the statewide description — oxidation, diffusion, metallisation, photolithography and characterisation — are process steps, not circuit concepts. Expect chemistry, materials science and thermodynamics alongside the electrical engineering. Students arriving from a purely circuits background regularly find the first weeks unfamiliar, and it is worth knowing that in advance rather than discovering it in week three.

Learning Outcomes

Required Outcomes

Optional Outcomes

Major Topics

Required Topics

Optional Topics

Resources & Tools

Career Pathways

Special Information

⚠ This is a chemistry and materials course as much as an electrical one

The single most useful thing to know before registering. Oxidation is a chemical reaction whose rate is governed by diffusion through a growing film. Diffusion is Fick’s laws with an Arrhenius temperature dependence. Etching is surface chemistry. Deposition is thermodynamics and kinetics. The electrical engineering appears mainly at the end, when the finished device is characterised.

Students who chose electrical engineering partly to avoid chemistry sometimes find this course uncomfortable. Students who enjoyed chemistry and materials frequently find it the most satisfying course in the degree, because it is where the abstraction finally bottoms out in physical processes. Either way, expect to use exponentials, Arrhenius relations and error functions constantly — more than in any other course in the electrical engineering curriculum.

Prerequisites

The prerequisites are EEE 3300 and EEE 3300L — Electronics I and its laboratory. What they stand for is an understanding of what semiconductor devices are and what their parameters mean, so that a process step can be connected to a device consequence.

⚠ The unnamed requirement is general chemistry. The statewide and institutional prerequisites do not list it, but oxidation kinetics, dopant chemistry, plasma etching and deposition all assume a working knowledge of reactions, stoichiometry and thermodynamics. Most electrical engineering students will have taken CHM 2045; those who deferred it should expect to be working harder than classmates who did not. Reviewing reaction kinetics and the Arrhenius equation before the term is worthwhile and takes an afternoon.

Position in the curriculum

EEE 4330 is a senior-level elective in the microelectronics track, following Electronics I and its laboratory. It complements the device-physics courses — EEE 4351 Solid-State Electronic Devices at the same institutions — by supplying the manufacturing side of the same subject. A student taking both has a substantially more complete picture than one taking either alone, and the pair is what a fab recruiter looks for.

⚠ Course-code variation across Florida

Semiconductor fabrication is taught under several numbers in Florida, and this is one of the less portable:

SCNS equivalency does not cross course numbers. The content of these overlaps heavily, but a receiving programme naming its requirement by number will not match them automatically. Carry the syllabus, and where a cleanroom laboratory was involved, keep evidence of it — hands-on fabrication experience is exactly what a substitution committee and an employer both want to see documented.

Cleanroom laboratory: what to expect

Where the course includes a cleanroom component, several practical points apply:

Difficulty and time commitment

The mathematics is not hard in itself — error functions, exponentials and Arrhenius relations — but the breadth is considerable, and each process step brings its own vocabulary, its own model and its own set of practical constraints. The characteristic difficulty is retention rather than derivation. Plan on eight to ten hours a week, more where a cleanroom laboratory is scheduled, and note that laboratory time is often outside normal class hours because equipment must be shared.

Articulation and transfer

SCNS records EEE 4330 as guaranteed to transfer to an institution offering the same course. Only one Florida institution carries the number, so read that guarantee narrowly and expect to argue equivalence from a syllabus. The course is upper-division, carries 3 credits, and has no general-education or Gordon Rule designation.

FE exam relevance

The NCEES Fundamentals of Engineering (Electrical and Computer) exam covers semiconductor materials and devices but does not test fabrication processes. This course is taken for its own value and for employability rather than for FE coverage.

AI Integration

Semiconductor manufacturing is one of the industries where machine learning has been most thoroughly and least visibly adopted, which makes this section a description of current practice rather than a caution.

Where AI is genuinely used in the discipline. Modern fabs run machine learning throughout: virtual metrology predicts a measurement that would be too slow to take on every wafer; defect classification from inspection images replaced manual review years ago; predictive maintenance anticipates tool drift before it produces scrap; advanced process control adjusts recipes run to run; and yield analysis correlates thousands of process parameters against electrical test results to find root causes no engineer would identify by inspection. A graduate entering process engineering will work with these systems immediately, and being able to interrogate them rather than merely accept their output is a genuine differentiator.

Where a general-purpose assistant helps in coursework. Explaining why the Deal–Grove model has both a linear and a parabolic regime; walking through a diffusion or implant calculation; generating MATLAB or Python code for doping profiles and oxidation kinetics; explaining an unfamiliar tool or process acronym, of which this field has an unusual number; and summarising a process flow as a starting point for checking.

⚠ Where it fails, and why the failure coincides with this course’s subject. The characteristic error of an AI tool asked a fabrication question is to state a process recipe — a temperature, a time, a dose, a gas flow — with confidence and without conditions. That is precisely the misunderstanding this course exists to remove. A process recipe is not portable. It is specific to a tool, a chamber, a wafer size, a film stack and a facility, and the same nominal recipe on two different tools produces different results. This is why fabs qualify each tool individually and why process transfer between fabs is a major engineering project rather than a copy operation. A confident recipe with no equipment context attached is not an answer, and treating it as one is the error that a process engineer is employed to prevent.

A second failure has real safety weight. Models will describe chemical procedures — HF etching, piranha preparation, solvent handling — without the controls that make them survivable. Hydrofluoric acid in particular causes injuries whose seriousness is not apparent at the time of exposure, and the correct handling procedure is a facility-specific document backed by specific training and specific antidote provision. Never take a chemical procedure from a generated answer. The safety data sheet and your facility’s standard operating procedure are the only acceptable sources, and this is the one place in this guide where the consequence of ignoring the point is physical injury rather than a poor grade.

Third: models frequently give process parameters appropriate to a technology node they have not been told about, mixing figures from 1990s micron-scale processes with current practice. Since much of this course is about how processes changed as devices scaled, an answer that blends eras is worse than no answer.

The engineer’s responsibility. In manufacturing, a process specification is a commitment that a step will produce a stated result on a stated tool within a stated tolerance, verified by measurement. The engineer signs for the measurement, not for the plausibility of the recipe. The habit worth forming here is to ask of every process figure: on what tool, on what film stack, at what wafer size, and verified by what metrology?

Academic integrity. FAMU and FSU both maintain academic honour policies covering AI-generated work. Calculations and process analysis are normally expected to be your own even where computational assistance is permitted, and generated laboratory or metrology data is data fabrication — treated more seriously than plagiarism, and in a manufacturing context a direct rehearsal of professional misconduct. Ask before you rely on a tool, and disclose its use where the syllabus requires it.


Generated September 9, 2026 · Updated September 9, 2026