24,428 courses · 2,504 curriculum guides Sponsored by eAgentic Software Sponsored by eAgentic Software

AMH3403: Modern South

AMH3403 — The American South From the 20TH Century
← Course Modules
3 credit hours 45 contact hours Prerequisites: None listed at UWF. ⚠ A 3000-level course that assumes the American history survey sequence -- AMH 2010 and especially AMH 2020, the post-1877 half, which is widely taught at Florida state colleges and transfers cleanly. The course begins after the Civil War and does not re-teach it. ⚠ Only one of the four institutions' catalogs was retrievable, so the mechanics and the economic emphasis described are UWF's; the chronological start point varies by institution. v1.0

Course Description

AMH3403 Modern South is the regional history course that explains how the American South got from emancipation to the Sun Belt — and why that took a century.

The statewide inventory records the course at Florida A&M University, the University of Central Florida, the University of North Florida and the University of West Florida.

Evidence base. Of those four, only the University of West Florida's catalog was retrievable; UCF and UNF publish no fetchable course descriptions and FAMU's catalog was not reachable. The specifics below are UWF's. The subject is a well-established field with a settled scholarly shape, so the outcomes and topics can be stated with reasonable confidence — but the course mechanics, and any given instructor's chronological cut, should be checked against your own institution's catalog.

UWF places it in the College of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of History and Philosophy at 3 semester hours, and its description is unusually specific about the course's argument:

"With a focus on the postbellum period through the twentieth century, this course examines the convergence of social and economic factors that established a new power structure in the Southern United States. Students will explore how Southern employers, in their quest to secure cheap labor for farms and other industrial operations, may have perpetuated the region's economic stagnation by employing systems such as sharecropping, tenant farming, crop liens, debt peonage, and convict leasing. Students will learn about the efforts of different Presidential administrations to mitigate conditions in the South, which FDR once called 'the nation's number one economic problem.' Eventually, government intervention transformed the south from an agrarian backwater to the heart of American industrial power."

That is a thesis, not a topic list, and it is worth reading twice before registering. The course's organising question is economic: how the labour systems that replaced slavery shaped the region's development, and why the South remained the poorest part of the country for three generations after the Civil War. Race is central to that story — the labour systems were racial systems — but the course frames it as political economy rather than as a narrative of race relations alone.

The chronological spine. Reconstruction and its overthrow; the crop-lien economy and the making of a sharecropping South; the imposition of Jim Crow and disfranchisement in the 1890s; convict leasing and debt peonage; Populism and its defeat; the Great Migration; the New Deal and the arrival of federal money; wartime industrialisation; the civil rights movement; and the emergence of the Sun Belt.

The central intellectual problem the course sets is causal, and genuinely contested. Historians disagree about why the postbellum South stayed poor — whether the binding constraint was the credit system, the labour system, low human-capital investment, external colonial-style extraction, or political choices that suppressed wages deliberately. The UWF description signals a labour-and-credit reading ("in their quest to secure cheap labor… may have perpetuated the region's economic stagnation"), and the hedge in "may have" is doing real work: this is an argument the course examines, not a settled fact it delivers.

Who takes it. History majors and minors as a regional upper-division field; students in African American studies, political science, sociology and Southern studies; and — in Florida particularly — future secondary social studies teachers, for whom this is the deep background to material they will teach.

Learning Outcomes

Required Outcomes

Optional Outcomes

Major Topics

Required Topics

Optional Topics

Resources & Tools

Career Pathways

An honest framing: this is a field course in a humanities major, not a credential. What it builds is the ability to handle contested evidence, weigh competing explanations of the same events, and write an argument that survives scrutiny — and the destinations below reflect that.

Special Information

⚠ Single-source guide — read the mechanics as UWF's

Four institutions carry the number; one catalog answered.

Prerequisites and position in the curriculum

UWF lists no prerequisite.This is a 3000-level upper-division course, and the practical assumption is that you have completed the American history survey sequence (AMH2010/AMH2020 statewide) and can write a college-level analytical essay.

The survey matters more here than the catalog implies. The course begins after the Civil War and does not re-teach it; a student without the survey spends the first weeks acquiring context everyone else already has. AMH2020 — the post-1877 half — is the one to have.

Florida College System institutions do not generally offer this course; AMH2010 and AMH2020 are the lower-division numbers, they are widely taught, and they transfer cleanly. Take them before transferring.

Course format and workload

3 credits, 45 contact hours — lecture and discussion, three hours per week. UWF notes it may not be repeated for credit.

Expect 6–9 hours per week outside class. ⚠ The load is reading, and it is heavier than the credit count suggests — an upper-division history course commonly assigns a book every week or two alongside articles and primary documents.

Assessment normally combines examinations with essay questions, short analytical papers on assigned readings, a research or historiographical paper, and participation. ⚠ Learn to read a monograph for its argument rather than cover to cover — introduction, conclusion, and the chapters that carry the argument. That skill is assumed and rarely taught explicitly.

⚠ Difficult material, and how the course handles it

This course deals directly with racial violence, coerced labour, lynching, disfranchisement and their long consequences. That is not incidental to the subject; it is the subject.

⚠ Florida's ambiguous position, which is worth raising in class

Florida is a Southern state whose twentieth century looks unlike the rest of the South. It had sharecropping, convict leasing — ⚠ the death of Martin Tabert in a Florida turpentine camp in 1922 is what ended the state's convict-lease system and drew national attention to the practice — disfranchisement and Jim Crow. It also had, from the 1920s, tourism, land speculation, air conditioning and enormous in-migration from the North and from Cuba, which made South Florida demographically unlike Alabama or Mississippi within a generation.

The result is that "the South" means something different in Pensacola than in Miami, and a course taught in Florida can use the state as a test case for what the regional category actually explains. The Rosewood massacre (1923) and the Ocoee election-day massacre (1920) are Florida events and are documented in state records available through Florida Memory.

Articulation and transfer

The number AMH3403 is used at all four institutions in the inventory, so SCNS articulation is clean where the receiving institution offers the course.

The practical transfer question is not the number but the requirement. Upper-division history majors normally require distribution across geographic and chronological fields, and this course fills a US-regional slot at one institution and may fill a different one elsewhere. Where a receiving department does not teach it, expect it to count as an upper-division history elective. Keep the syllabus.

Prefix note. AMH is American history; AMS is American studies (interdisciplinary); AFA/AFH African American and African history; HIS general history. ⚠ A course substantially similar to this one may be numbered under AFA where a department places it in African American studiessearch by subject rather than prefix.

AI Integration

Where AI assistance genuinely helps here:

⚠⚠ Where it fails, and the failures are specific to history:

AI as a subject in this course.Digitisation and machine transcription have genuinely changed what an undergraduate can do — the WPA narratives, census manuscripts and newspaper runs that once required a research trip are searchable from a laptop. That is a real methodological shift and worth understanding. It also has a bias: what has been digitised is not a neutral sample of what survives, and what survives is not a neutral sample of what happened. The records of the powerful survive at higher rates than the records of the poor, which is a problem this course's subject matter makes unusually visible.

Academic integrity. Follow the course policy. Submitting generated prose as your own violates every Florida institution's policy, and in history fabricated citation is normally treated as the more serious offence — because it corrupts the evidentiary chain the discipline runs on.


Generated September 8, 2026 · Updated September 8, 2026